Home » Pay Gov » Unauthorized Transactions Vex Prepaid Consumers in Latest CFPB Report
Print view|Purchase Reprint
04.19.17

Unauthorized Transactions Vex Prepaid Consumers in Latest CFPB Report

Prepaid complaints to the CPFB hit 2,500 in 2016, accounting for about 0.9 percent of the 291,400 complaints in agency’s latest Consumer Response Annual Report. The leading type of complaints about prepaid products involved unauthorized transactions or other transactions issues. The number of prepaid complaints in 2016 decreased by nearly 17 percent.

Debt collection issues accounted for 30 percent of all complaints to the CFPB last year, the largest single source of complaints and about the same as 2015, when those complaints made up 31 percent. Other complaints include:

  • Credit reporting, about 19 percent, compared with 20 percent in 2015
  • Mortgages, 18 percent, down from 19 percent
  • Bank account or services, 10 percent, up from 8 percent
  • Credit cards, 9 percent, up from 8 percent
  • Consumer loans, 6 percent, up from 5 percent
  • Student loans, 4 percent, up from 3 percent
  • Payday loans, 2 percent, the same as in 2015
  • Prepaid, 0.9 percent, down from 1 percent
  • Money transfers, 0.8 percent, down from 0.9 percent
  • Other financial services, 0.7 percent, the same as in 2015

Unauthorized transactions or other transactions issues accounted for 33 percent of all the complaints in the prepaid category in 2016. Other prepaid issues consumers cited include managing, opening or closing accounts (29 percent); fraud or scams (22 percent); fees (7 percent); advertising, marketing or disclosures (4 percent); adding money (about 4 percent); and overdraft, savings or rewards features (about 2 percent).

Access to Funds

“Frequently, these consumers also expressed hardships resulting from the lack of access to their funds,” the report said. “Some consumers stated that after disputing a particular charge, the company would often freeze the entire available balance to prevent further loss while the claim was under review. During the review process, companies sometimes requested additional information—such as purchase receipts or original packaging—which the consumers often stated was no longer in their possession.”

The report comes on the heels of Netspend settling with the FTC over claims that the company deceived cardholders and denied or delayed their access to funds contrary to marketing messages about instant access to funds. Interestingly, Acting FTC Chair Maureen Ohlhausen voted against the settlement, saying: “In the context of direct deposit advertising, reasonable consumers would interpret ‘immediate access’ to refer to the timesaving benefits of direct deposit as compared to waiting for a paper check to be mailed, physically depositing the check at the bank and waiting for the bank to make those funds available in an individual’s account. Banks, credit unions and even the Social Security Administration commonly use the phrase ‘immediate access’ to describe the timesaving benefits of direct deposit.”

Related stories:

Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *